I hear the word a *lot* around here. It's a novel feeling, because while the society I come from is big on respect, it is a thing that remains largely inarticulated. No one bandies the actual word about. There is little talk about being respectful or feeling disrespected, or even about children being disrespectful--a favourite theme of most grown-ups. On the event that the latter is discussed, the behaviour is usually labelled as rudeness, or more circumspectly, as "a lack of good manners". And I've absolutely never heard anyone say, "I feel disrespected". Or any variations thereof. If one has to demand respect, I was always told, that person probably does not deserve it. That respect isn't Halloween sweets. You cannot demand someone give you a fistful of it just because it pleases you to coddle your system with it.
I overheard a conversation on the metro the other day, where an uncle-type was telling off a late teen for disrespecting him... because said late teen refused to buy the brand of tyres uncle recommended. To classify rejection of advice as disrespect seemed ridiculous to me, but to the uncle it seemed perfectly legit. "I have been driving on these roads for more winters than you have been born [sic.]", he emphasised. "I know more about them than you do. I'm trying to share this knowledge with you. But I will not be disrespected in public because your roommate likes a different brand!"
I watched the man closely, and he reminded me of nothing so much as a tiny little frog puffed up with an inflated sense of it's own importance, just at the verge of bursting with a messy wet "PLOP!" He inspired amusement and condescending pity, but never 'respect' (as I understand it).
Therefore I get the feeling this American 'respect' is a different beast from the one we find back at the tropics. It's not the thing we dutifully offer up to our, say, school teachers--the ones that taught us our alphabets and numbers and the ones that screamed us through differential calculus. In fact, I get the feeling school teachers don't command much respect in the US at all. Anyway. The point is that in India there are certain categories of people that command respect by sheer virtue of their categories, and this respect is a sort of public demonstration of "looking up to", even if there is no actual feeling of respect involved. In the US, on the other hand, I think 'respect' has got more to do with protecting one's rights to whatever (validating one's ethnic identity, emphasising one's individuality, etc.), and making sure no one points and laughs or gets nasty while said rights are being exercised. Again, such observances of 'respect' do not necessarily demand the observer actually support such rights ideologically, merely that he keeps his toes off other people's territory. Or so I think, anyway. I'm not sure about the 'respect' dynamics here yet. And yet I have already, according to my American acquaintances, experienced this 'respect'--or lack thereof--first hand. This morning, in fact. And at a university office, no less.
So I walk into a campus office for the third time in a row, because I need to put my name down on a list. The first time I went, I was asked for my passport. I went back with my passport, and was asked for my social security. This was the third time, and I was armed with my passport AND my social. Confident that the matter would be dealt with in a few minutes, I approached the undergraduate student employee behind the counter. She asked to see my I-20. I confessed I wasn't carrying mine, it being a valuable doc. and all, and promised to return (yet again). However, I asked her for a check-list of *all* the things I would need, since I did not wish to carry my passport, I-20 and social security card for a fifth trip. This was when the episode truly began. First, the girl merely repeated herself slowly and clearly, as one does to the deaf or the mentally deficient: "Look. You don't have your I-20. We need your I-20. Just come back with your I-20, and we'll do it."
I should probably have left it at that and left altogether, but one's patience wears thin after three failed trips, especially if they're no fault of one's own. So I asked if my university ID would suffice, since it was issued after my I-20 was scrutinised. At this the girl threw her hands up in exasperation.
Girl: Okay. Do you speak English? Or should I get someone to translate? Because clearly I'm not getting through to you. Before I give you any money [because my father is the University tsar, of course, and all it's money is hidden under my bed], I need to know that you are not here illegally and that you have the legal right to work in America.
At which point I decided I should perhaps seek out an employee actually in possession of her mind, so I gave the girl a friendly nod and started walking carefully away, not turning my back on her.
Girl: uh, excuse me! Yeah, I need to know: are you already working for the university? Are you getting any money from us?
Rimi (from a safe distance): yes. I draw a regular stipend.
Girl (in a blend of sanctimoniousness and "take that!" manner): you should know that you are doing it illegally. You have no right to do that. If I wanted I could report you.
Unfortunately, I suffer from a secret hero complex. I could have walked away from this without a further word, because the dumb child's crassness rather amused me, but suddenly I pictured another international student who actually doesn't speak English too well, and who doesn't know that stipends are perfectly legal and are paid by a completely different university office. I pictured this person in my place, thoroughly harassed and confused because a minor clog in a major machine was power-tripping by virtue of having access to a daily stamp and a cluster of cheap office supplies. Bullies are my secret button.
I gave the too-thin brunette a thoughtful once-over. She looked back at me with--and I could be a wrong--a superior glint in her eye.
"Has anyone ever told you," I said in a slow, largely indifferent voice, "that you are a singularly unpleasant young woman?"
The singularly unpleasant young woman did an exaggerated imitation of dropping her jaw in shock, while managing to gasp out a "What???"
"I know you don't need a translator for that," I continued in an indulgently reprimanding tone, "because I speak rather a classy version of your language. Now, I'm going to be back tomorrow, and you will manage to make yourself unavailable when I am here, because if I have to speak to you again, there might be unpleasant consequences."
And I left, this time turning my back on her, confident that I'd uprooted her venom-sack--if temporarily. I heard her say in a shocked voice to her colleague, "Did you hear what she said to me? Oh my god, she was like, so disrespectful! Okay, now I'm officially upset. Did you just hear the things she said?"
"In my country," I wanted to turn around and say, "respect has to be earned, not demanded. And you fail the qualifiers by a couple of thousand miles, cupcake."
But I didn't. This lily, I felt, didn't need that extra guilding.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


31 comments:
tussi great ho.
rasgulle di plate ho!
you should insult people more and then write about it. Its fun!
I suppose the dumb floozy didn't know what "checklist" means. She probably thought it was an Indian word.
Bravo! I was almost standing up and clapping after reading this! The average American can be far more frustrating than your average Indian housemaid (who sometimes simply doesn't get you)!!!
I don't expect any better from a nation who spends more than they earn, goes around the globe "fixing" problems while domestic issues pile-up on their backyard and live on cholesterol-soaked super-size burgers, large fries and gallons of cola!
She could have very well been a flaky blonde but I have to "respectfully" disagree with you. After living in the U.S. for four years, the one thing I have observed is that, over there, respect is earned, NOT, as you say, demanded.
Unlike, in India, where respect is accorded (and often demanded) according to age and status. Whether it is your grandparents, or your high-school teacher or our very own government babus. You are expected to be respectful towards them. Whether they deserve it or not, is a separate issue.
In the U.S., EVERYONE -- right from the President to the building sweeper -- earns the respect that is accorded to them. Nobody expects it, nor are they entitled to it simply as a virtue of age, relation, or social status.
Just my $0.02 for the day. =D
I love you, you know that, no?
@ chinky – yes Indians in certain positions do expect (and sometimes demand) respect from the rest of the junta. But, that is because most of the populace happily lick ass. I work for an MNC consulting company and have highly-educated and enormously capable colleagues lick their bosses’ ass clean every day without fail. Is this servile attitude now hard-coded in our genes after a mere 200 years of colonial rule?
Why the average American’s stupidity is so glaring because we do not expect them to be so. I have lived in Europe for the last 3 years and even here a janitor is treated with dignity. So it is not just the US. However, I have not encountered a single instance of “American” idiocy here.
Did you see her the next day? Or did she follow your advice and make herself scarce?
Her flabber must never have been so gasted:)
Insi--thank you Insi. I'm sure that's a compliment, although I'm not sure why :P
Roy--thank you, but it's not actually fun. I hate being sharp with people, because then I go over the matter over and over compulsively and wonder if I was too harsh, too quick judge, and so on.
But this one probably had it coming. I don't like bullies.
Mr. Bananas--she might have :D "Dumb floozy" is wonderfully descriptive, but I feel in this instance a strong case can be made in favour of "vindictive prejudiced bitch".
Anon--you know, I used to be rather anti-US while I wasn't personally acquainted with Americans. Well, me and the rest of the world. I knew at an abstract level that not all Americans could possibly be redneck Republicans with Fox News addictions, but the last administration made it very hard for those of us not in the country to think charitably of Americans as a whole (I wonder whether the majority of Pakistanis are indoctrinated to feel the same way about Indians).
I still seethe at various instances of collective American silliness (well, to me anyway)-- such as the devilisation of socialism and the complete idiocy of impoverished working classes marching against the public health option--but at least I no longer classify all Americans as an uniform block of short-sighted, arrogant, conspicuous consumers that deserved the President it used to have.
Oddly, when I used to hold the idea of twenty-first century US (read, Bush-led US) in contempt, I found it difficult to publicly criticise it, since I was certain my prejudice would colour my critique. Nowadays, I'm able to treat rude or stupid Americans as rude or stupid fellow-human beings, and feel no compunction at all in mocking them publicly.
I know this isn't related directly to your comment. Sorry about the stream-of-consciousnessy reply :D
Chinky--that's a very noble sentiment indeed, and I'm glad you feel the way you do. I am perhaps a little too critical: so could you actually outline for me how the President and the cleaner 'earns' the respect they supposedly receive?
Because you're quite right, of course. The West does not socially stigmatise certain spheres of labour like we do, but is that not often--if not always--a politically correct varnish over ground realities of no health benefits, very low wages, and very little social status attached to blue-collar jobs? An American janitor may not suffer from the caste-based stigmas an Indian janitor might suffer from, but by the parameters of his/her own society, is (s)he quite the glorified individual?
Something to consider, isn't it?
Rhea--right back at you, babe :-)
Anon--I wish you would leave a name or an email address. Anonymouses confuse me--are you the same Anon as before?
Dipali--I shall be back tomorrow. And if she doesn't make herself scarce, I hope she at least makes herself useful. I have now been tutored in the American way of dealing with troublesome employees--I shall ask for her supervisor! :D
Eh, I just meant respect in a very basic sense. I have had lunch at a college professor's house with him and his plumber who came to fix the kitchen sink. I don't see the same respect/courtesy -- call it what you will -- being extended to plumbers or mechanics here. And I doubt it ever will. The concept of the basic dignity of labor simply doesn't exist here.
It took me a great deal of time to understand that my father doesn't deserve respect simply because he is my father. He deserves respect if he is a good man, a good father. If he is not, and I call him out on it, I shall not be struck down by lightning. My aunt may very well be my aunt, but if she is a bitch, then she IS one. I'm not being very eloquent, am I?
A great deal of respect is accorded to the *office* of the POTUS. However, an individual Commander-in-Chief still has to prove his worth. Bush was a well-meaning, blubbering moron and I have heard plenty of my American friends and acquaintances denounce him in the last four years. But then again, I was in a hippie liberal town in upstate New York, so what do I know? : )
Chinky--fair enough example. Although I have a feeling that while the plumber was treated with "dignity" (I'm still not exactly sure what this entails, but we'll drop it), perhaps an academic colleague of your professor's would be more warmly welcomed. But then again the plumber was at the house to do a job, not avail of the customer's hospitality, so it seems to balance out.
I don't want to cast aspersions on the people you've associated with in India, Chinky, but is it not usually the custom to offer plumbers, cleaners, domestic helps, electricians and so on cups of tea and biscuits/salty snacks (and if they're working for long hours, meals)? This is certainly the norm where I come from. And I quite honestly have a hard time conceptualising offering a person food from one's own kitchen on one's own utensils (it's a big deal in India, you know that) and at the same time treating them in an undignified or contemptuous manner.
I think what's tripping us here is a lack of a culturally relativistic notion of the dignity of labour. Certain kinds of work carry social stigma in India because it's probably perceived as 'unclean'. Janitors wold certainly qualify. Or the social stigma of a lack of education or professional skills, to which one can put most blue-collar jobs. However, most people actually develop a personal relationship with their domestic helps, cooks, drivers, local electricians and so on--perhaps because we're a nosy culture and don't know any better than to poke our proboscis into other people's affairs. I'm hard-pressed to imagine an affluent middle-class or upper middle-class employer developing a personal relationship with any of the service people he occasionally employs beyond the polite conversation when they meet, simply because spheres of living are so deeply segregated along economic lines here.
And besides, the US has it's own set of social stigmas. Stigmas which we don't get, or at least didn't till fairly recently. Like that against fat people, for example. Indians till my generation, at least, don't understand why "getting fat" should have social and professional ramifications, why chances of promotion, dinner invitations and spousal fidelity drop once one puts on a certain amount of weight--and why that is actually socially acceptable.
One must give the devil it's due--and also the minor gods and goddesses, I suppose--but let's not overlook the shades of grey in favour of the black and white, yes?
Aah, this conversation is an interesting one. And I might do a post on it too. I see what you're saying. Leave aside social stigmas. I'm certainly not saying that we are rude or contemptuous here. Our drivers/ mechanics/ electricians are offered tea or biscuits when they work for long hours. They probably sit in the balcony or kitchen corner but I don't forsee a day when they eat lunch at the dining table with my father or sit on the sofa to watch the television during a five-minute break. *That* I think, is the essential difference. My professor, I and the plumber ate at the dining table and they spoke as equals, discussing their respective jobs, rising gas prices, the Iraq war etc. Similarly, my mother treats our maids very well but she certainly would throw a fit if a maid or an aiyah sat on the bed or couch. You can tell me it's different at your place.
I have to say, I do find this notion of culturally relative dignity of labor quite intriguing. Didn't think of it that way before -- I just assumed their universality. Then again, maybe, basic dignity/respect should, in fact, be an universal human right. (Ah, and the latent idealist in me rises).
@ Chinky - Let me attempt to make some sense of "culturally relative dignity of labor". To start off with - let's change the equation a bit to reflect the social and monetary gap that is prevalent between an employer and her ayah in India. Let's say an American and his butler (even though rarer than an ayah). Will a butler ever sit in his master's dining table???
The comparison between an American professor-American plumber and Indian Mother-Indian ayah is flawed. The economic, social and cultural gap in the Indian context is many times more than the American one. Don't you think?
- Thinking Aloud
If you quote yourself verbatim, why then, my singularly pleasant young woman- I adore you! (Which I already do because of similar posts yadda yadda)
On a completely different note, I think tumi khub bhalo ingreji lekho.
What? Just saying!
Ahona--I don't quote myself verbatim. I'm not actually sure I said "a classier version", but I did say the rest, and I felt it was well-deserved.
March Hare--ki kando. Thank you. Eibar banglaye likhe aaro proshongsha aadaye korte hobe ;-)
Thinking Aloud--thanks for chipping in. I quite agree.
Chinky--I admire idealists. I always have, probably because I'm far too nitpicky and cynical to be one. Here is how I view the "liberal" ideology of equal dignity for all: can a cultural outsider (in this case, the liberal west) ever determine what the parameters of dignity are in a society that is not hers? She can certainly critique structures she finds displeasing in other societies (as well as her own, of course). But since she isn't an organic part of the culture, demanding that her or her culture's notions of dignity be reproduced in another society... doesn't that tantamounts to forceful imposition, and therefore of cultural colonialism? After all, if all cultures tried to embody the social values of one particularly strong nation state, wouldn't they become imperfect copies of--and therefore subjugated to--the said powerful nation state? And aren't such forcefully imposed social changes diametrically opposite to the liberal agenda, that this is a free world and no one gets away with acting superior and bossy and telling other people how to "better" live their lives?
If I can tear you away from domestic labour in India for a moment, I'd like to remind you of the trouble Euro-American social missionaries faced in 'saving' Afghan women from the purdah system. A small number of the women rejoiced, and more power to them. But a great deal of Afghan women felt
A. their sense of identity--which ironically the western cultures value a great deal--was being violated by these people who had NO idea how the burqua served to empower women in a patriarchy. So unless these outsiders could change Afghan society magically overnight, they had no business barging in and 'dignifying' them as 'free' women.
B. that furthermore, they were also being extremely insulted when foreigners thought of them as spineless puppets that danced to the tune of their men--merely because they adhered to the burqua. These women had never conceived of themselves as anything of that sort and did not like being told what and how to think.
So unless one can magically change Indian society--lower population dramatically, raise the efficiency of public health, public roads, public offices, public education et al to the level of western Europe and the US, one has no business demanding that a perfectly viable model of social interaction be dismantled forcefully and a model that works only in the w.European and North American economic context be put in place. And while we're on the subject one might well remember that in pre-industrial--in fact, till fairly recently actually--west Europe also followed a strict social hierarchy of "a place for everyone and everyone in their place".
Social justice isn't easy to achieve. But it's almost unbeliavbly easy to mess up. It pays to be careful, and critical, and take contexts of apparent inequality into consideration.
My last two cents on this topic:
The difference really is that in India, unskilled labor is not only abundant but also dirt cheap. So every middle-class family has a maid/driver, part-time or full-time etc. whereas in the U.S./West, labor, as an economic factor of production, is a much more expensive commodity. You will find only rich, upper-class Americans having personal chauffeurs or butlers, and usually the latter are highly trained professionals. Butlering is an art. (Is that a word?) Not the same as sweeping the floor.
And yes, while the butler may not eat with his employer, he probably eats at the same table, if later, and has his own room and bed and other amenities. Our maids sleep on the floor on their thin, tattered mattresses, usually in the kitchen. The very base of the economic relationship is very different.
Of course, there are more complexities to it and I'm not going to get dragged into another separate debate about burqas. Don't get me started on how much it annoys me when some ditzy blonde in politics class will go, "OMG, that is so sad. I wish I could help them. How can we save them?" Who asked her to go about saving the world to begin with -- as if the burden of the world is resting on her pretty white shoulders.
It could be just, Rimi, that you and I view "injustices" through different lenses. You might approach it from a culturally relativistic point of view, whereas to me an injustice is an injustice, whether it happens in the U.S. or in my own backyard. Now, is there something I'm going to do about it? Not really. So, not quite the idealist you thought I was.
You write very, very well but I find it quite a waste that you put this skill to defending “cultural relativism”. I am with Chinky: human dignity should not be parceled out, period.
Now, to address the episode you so deliciously described. Here is how I see it: the girl asked for your I-20, you replied with, won’t my university ID do, since in YOUR mind it was equivalent as it had been issued after the I-20 was checked, at which point she lost it and so did you. But don’t you see: you indulged in a peculiarly Indian habit (cultural relativism?) of trying to make-do with what you have rather than follow the rules. Maybe she needed the I-20 to get some information off it – the reason doesn’t really matter. Granted she was not very helpful, and rude, but your response was unwarranted as well. BTW, from what I remember of my early student days in this country many, many moons ago, the I-20 was stapled to the passport because it, along with the visa stamp, was proof of your status. So maybe, when you were first asked to get your passport it was assumed that the I-20 would be in there?
Not really interested in debating this further: I wander through blogs commenting when the fancy strikes me before moving on..
- Not one of the previous anons.
"Butlering is an art. (Is that a word?) Not the same as sweeping the floor.
And yes, while the butler may not eat with his employer, he probably eats at the same table, if later, and has his own room and bed and other amenities. Our maids sleep on the floor on their thin, tattered mattresses, usually in the kitchen. The very base of the economic relationship is very different."
@ Chinky - I agree to all of the above, but if the Indian maid's condition is worse off than the American butler - so is the condition of the employing Indian middles class family than the American millionaire. Hence, the butler very well may be trained, dressed in well cut attires and be residing in his own room (in the 7 bedroom mansion). But the Ayah serves a family with a 2 bedroom/ hall/ kitchen pigeon hole apartment - hence, she will be sleeping on the floor in the living room/ kitchen on a hand-me-down mattress.
That is how it is – if the we compare the butler with the maid, we must compare the American millionaire to the Indian middle class family as well. When I was reciting my Indian life to my Dutch boss the other day – I was talking about how I had a driver, a “dhobi” to press my cloths, 1 maid to clean the house, 1 maid to cook, plumbers/electricians on demand so on and so forth. I told him that in hindsight – it was quite a luxurious life I had there. In comparison I hated the fact that in Europe, I am doing my own laundry, mopping, vacuuming, doing the dishes, cooking and using public transport! Maybe my Indian life has made me lazy! I told him I felt that we Indians misuse the availability of cheap labour!!!
The Dutchman replied – maybe it is not so bad, you are providing employment to so many people and it is feeding them and their families. How is that bad? I think you are just luckier than Europeans in this case! That’s all!
- Thinking Aloud
Ki jaataa dead-head conversation Rimi,I must also be allowed to be inane.
Kintu tarpor , was there Samurai showdown at a moonlit beach later?
Chinky--idealism doesn't need activism's stamp of approval :-) You're still an idelaist by my standards. And as for the rest, the fact of relating labour to the cultural context it exists in important precisely the way Thinking Aloud demonstrates it: if your family ever lived in a large joint-family home, you might ask them whether they had separate bedrooms for unmarried male and female helps, and "quarters" for married ones. Mine did. It's not middle-class generosity. It's pure self-interest--making sure the servants were always at hand and happy with their situation, because otherwise they would find employment elsewhere. And everyone knows the value of good domestic help.
But since those were your last two cents, thank you for your contribution to this conversation :-)
Not the previous anons--ah, one of those liberals who will shove dignity down our throats and haul us kicking and screaming towards "modernity" and consequent "egalitarianism", whether we like it or not. I suppose we need a few of you, too.
Pardon my unwarranted rudeness, but I have little patience with obviously intelligent people who so easily dismiss the very central tenet of ethical and cultural relativism. The world does not function on universals, my friend, although I dare say a great many of us benefit from pretending it does.
Also, just to refresh your memory a little: your I-20 is issued by your university. Your passport by (usually) your country of residence. The two have nothing to do with each other, except the common factor--you. So unless you fold your A-4 size multipage I-20 and keep it inside your passport, it has no way of making it there.
The document you're speaking of is your I-94, which is issued by the immigration department of the country you are visiting. This is usually a piece of paper the immigration officer at the entry point will staple to your passport, and the immigration officer at the point of exit tear off from it.
Thinking Aloud--this notion of domestic labour being "inhuman" always baffles me. If one's paying a reasonable wage with regular raises, giving bonuses during the big social do-s, and not mistreating the helps, how is it "inhuman"? What would, in that case, be "humane"? "Modernising" ourselves by filling our homes with machinary and taking employment away from these people? On the one hand that would raise our power consumption significantly--already Calcutta is suffering from five-hour power cuts daily--and MUCH more importantly, our ex-employees would *starve*. That's very humane, I suppose?
My lord Morpheus--birokto koro na. Dekhte pachho na borora sirius kotha bolchhe?
:D :D
@ Rimi - I agree with both my Dutch manager and you. How is it "inhuman" to employ a person and help him/her earn for his/her family? I agree that I would not be able to provide the "working conditions" suited for a trained butler - but as long as I am not mistreating and paying fare wages - I don't really see any moral issue in it.
Not that only the ayahs and the maids are lucky to be able to earn a living. I think the fact that even "middle-class" resident Indians have access to this luxury, which is unimaginable for even $300,000 pa salary earners elsewhere, is a good deal for us too...
The casual perception of a homogeneous world is totally myopic on the complexity and the distinctness of different human societies. And I think it is better to have distinct differences than live in a uniform world. Communism tried it and North Korea is not a very cheerful place to live now is it?
- Thinking Aloud
That's not disrespect; that's having high self-esteem (another thoroughly ambiguous American term).
Ugh! Good ole American racism at work. What an embarrassment.
Two thumbs up Rimi!! This post and the incident it narrates demanded a comment. It's fantastic to see how you kept a cool head even though you were getting angry under the collar. I'd not have been able to. :( Which is why my sarcasm limits its existence to only the inside of my brain. :(
M--racism? Do you really think so? Hmm. Interesting how one can have different lenses for the same incident. I thought it was a case of "me not small insignificant worm, me have power of bureaucracy!" Maybe it was both. Power tripping flavoured by racism, or racism expressed via bureaucratic red-tape.
And I don't see why you should be embarrassed. You're as sterling an example of your nationality as anyone can be :-) These obnoxious people are aberrants.
Rakhi--thank you :-)
Reading your exchange with Chinky remind me of something rather interesting that I noted about some European and US expats here in India: their principles/values seem to change with their country of residence. For example, I can think of a fair number of couples who would treat an ayah here far more inconsiderately than they would a nanny back home. It makes me think that their principles are more a reflection of their surroundings, not standards they live their lives by. You understand I'm generalising, of course. And I want to know what happened the next day!
Why are office staff the same everywhere? Is there something about working in an office that sends courtesy packing?
Also, this is ridiculously late to come into this now, but with reference to the discussion between Chinky and one of the Anons., the term "middle class" itself refers to different sections of the society in Indian and Western societies, respectively --- in the West, where it originated, it is tied to the kind of work one does, not to the monetary returns of that work; whereas in India it signifies a certain monetary capability, regardless of how it is earned.
RESPEKT!
Aretha Franklin was singing somewhere.
Peli seshmesh??
This reminds me of a similar conversation I had with an undergraduate student assistant who figured I did not know english simply because I asked a question. Excuse me, but apparently I axed a question. Snotty little airhead. I felt like slapping her face. I feel extremely offended on your behalf and I am extremely proud that you gave her a piece of your mind. What did she do the next time you saw her?
Post a Comment